↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

A Resurgence in Field Research is Essential to Better Understand the Diversity, Ecology, and Evolution of Microbial Eukaryotes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
A Resurgence in Field Research is Essential to Better Understand the Diversity, Ecology, and Evolution of Microbial Eukaryotes
Published in
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, February 2014
DOI 10.1111/jeu.12095
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thierry J. Heger, Virginia P. Edgcomb, Eunsoo Kim, Julius Lukeš, Brian S. Leander, Naoji Yubuki

Abstract

The discovery and characterization of protist communities from diverse environments are crucial for understanding the overall evolutionary history of life on earth. However, major questions about the diversity, ecology, and evolutionary history of protists remain unanswered, notably because data obtained from natural protist communities, especially of heterotrophic species, remain limited. In this review, we discuss the challenges associated with "field protistology", defined here as the exploration, characterization, and interpretation of microbial eukaryotic diversity within the context of natural environments or field experiments, and provide suggestions to help fill this important gap in knowledge. We also argue that increased efforts in field studies that combine molecular and microscopical methods offer the most promising path toward (1) the discovery of new lineages that expand the tree of eukaryotes; (2) the recognition of novel evolutionary patterns and processes; (3) the untangling of ecological interactions and functions, and their roles in larger ecosystem processes; and (4) the evaluation of protist adaptations to a changing climate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 58 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 42%
Environmental Science 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,260,667
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
#95
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,841
of 226,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them