↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Preliminary development of an ultrabrief two‐item bedside test for delirium

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hospital Medicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 2,398)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
70 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Preliminary development of an ultrabrief two‐item bedside test for delirium
Published in
Journal of Hospital Medicine, September 2015
DOI 10.1002/jhm.2418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna M Fick, Sharon K Inouye, Jamey Guess, Long H Ngo, Richard N Jones, Jane S Saczynski, Edward R Marcantonio

Abstract

Delirium is common, morbid, and costly, yet is greatly under-recognized among hospitalized older adults. To identify the best single and pair of mental status test items that predict the presence of delirium. Diagnostic test evaluation study that enrolled medicine inpatients aged 75 years or older at an academic medical center. Patients underwent a clinical reference standard assessment involving a patient interview, medical record review, and interviews with family members and nurses to determine the presence or absence of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition defined delirium. Participants also underwent the three-dimensional Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM), a brief, validated assessment for delirium. Individual items and pairs of items from the 3D-CAM were evaluated to determine sensitivity and specificity relative to the reference standard delirium diagnosis. Of the 201 participants (mean age 84 years, 62% female), 42 (21%) had delirium based on the clinical reference standard. The single item with the best test characteristics was "months of the year backwards" with a sensitivity of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69%-93%) and specificity of 69% (95% CI: 61%-76%). The best 2-item screen was the combination of "months of the year backwards" and "what is the day of the week?" with a sensitivity of 93% (95% CI: 81%-99%) and specificity of 64% (95% CI: 56%-70%). We identified a single item with >80% and pair of items with >90% sensitivity for delirium. If validated prospectively, these items will serve as an initial innovative screening step for delirium identification in hospitalized older adults. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2015. © 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#179,379
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hospital Medicine
#36
of 2,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,145
of 281,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hospital Medicine
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.