| Title |
Megafauna extinction, tree species range reduction, and carbon storage in Amazonian forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecography, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ecog.01587 |
| Authors |
Christopher E. Doughty, Adam Wolf, Naia Morueta‐Holme, Peter M. Jørgensen, Brody Sandel, Cyrille Violle, Brad Boyle, Nathan J. B. Kraft, Robert K. Peet, Brian J. Enquist, Jens‐Christian Svenning, Stephen Blake, Mauro Galetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Denmark | 2 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 106 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 59 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,107,144
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#289
of 2,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,378
of 297,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.