↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Rapid and highly variable warming of lake surface waters around the globe

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 21,751)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
81 news outlets
blogs
21 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
117 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
914 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
706 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Rapid and highly variable warming of lake surface waters around the globe
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, December 2015
DOI 10.1002/2015gl066235
Authors

Catherine M. O'Reilly, Sapna Sharma, Derek K. Gray, Stephanie E. Hampton, Jordan S. Read, Rex J. Rowley, Philipp Schneider, John D. Lenters, Peter B. McIntyre, Benjamin M. Kraemer, Gesa A. Weyhenmeyer, Dietmar Straile, Bo Dong, Rita Adrian, Mathew G. Allan, Orlane Anneville, Lauri Arvola, Jay Austin, John L. Bailey, Jill S. Baron, Justin D. Brookes, Elvira de Eyto, Martin T. Dokulil, David P. Hamilton, Karl Havens, Amy L. Hetherington, Scott N. Higgins, Simon Hook, Lyubov R. Izmest'eva, Klaus D. Joehnk, Kulli Kangur, Peter Kasprzak, Michio Kumagai, Esko Kuusisto, George Leshkevich, David M. Livingstone, Sally MacIntyre, Linda May, John M. Melack, Doerthe C. Mueller‐Navarra, Mikhail Naumenko, Peeter Noges, Tiina Noges, Ryan P. North, Pierre‐Denis Plisnier, Anna Rigosi, Alon Rimmer, Michela Rogora, Lars G. Rudstam, James A. Rusak, Nico Salmaso, Nihar R. Samal, Daniel E. Schindler, S. Geoffrey Schladow, Martin Schmid, Silke R. Schmidt, Eugene Silow, M. Evren Soylu, Katrin Teubner, Piet Verburg, Ari Voutilainen, Andrew Watkinson, Craig E. Williamson, Guoqing Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 706 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Canada 5 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Rwanda 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 680 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 141 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 19%
Student > Master 87 12%
Student > Bachelor 54 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 5%
Other 82 12%
Unknown 171 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 200 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 84 12%
Engineering 29 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 1%
Other 56 8%
Unknown 213 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 830. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#22,496
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#48
of 21,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248
of 397,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#1
of 343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.