↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Exploiting Mechanical Instabilities in Soft Robotics: Control, Sensing, and Actuation

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Exploiting Mechanical Instabilities in Soft Robotics: Control, Sensing, and Actuation
Published in
Advanced Materials, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/adma.202006939
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aniket Pal, Vanessa Restrepo, Debkalpa Goswami, Ramses V. Martinez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 21%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Master 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Unspecified 10 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 60 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 72 40%
Materials Science 11 6%
Unspecified 10 6%
Chemistry 6 3%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 70 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,680,078
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#11,383
of 14,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,887
of 431,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#181
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.