| Title |
PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and procedure‐specific postoperative pain management recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anaesthesia, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/anae.15498 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Anger, T. Valovska, H. Beloeil, P. Lirk, G. P. Joshi, M. Van de Velde, J. Raeder, the PROSPECT Working Group* and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 32 | 16% |
| United States | 11 | 5% |
| France | 8 | 4% |
| Spain | 6 | 3% |
| Mexico | 6 | 3% |
| Turkey | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 89 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 150 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 17% |
| Scientists | 11 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 72 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 73 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#318,309
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Anaesthesia
#141
of 5,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,022
of 460,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anaesthesia
#6
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.