| Title |
Why trees grow at night
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.17552 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roman Zweifel, Frank Sterck, Sabine Braun, Nina Buchmann, Werner Eugster, Arthur Gessler, Matthias Häni, Richard L. Peters, Lorenz Walthert, Micah Wilhelm, Kasia Ziemińska, Sophia Etzold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 160 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 6% |
| Argentina | 9 | 6% |
| France | 8 | 5% |
| Germany | 7 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 63 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 64% |
| Scientists | 53 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 66 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 86 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 237. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#161,583
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#32
of 9,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,724
of 452,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#2
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.