| Title |
Electronic charting of radiation therapy planning and treatment: Report of Task Group 262
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Physics, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mp.15116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James G. Mechalakos, Sonja Dieterich, Luis E. Fong de los Santos, Sandra C. Fontenla, Joseph Hanley, Vijay A. Harwalkar, Linda X. Hong, Y. Jessica Huang, Grace Gwe‐Ya Kim, Susan L. Richardson, Steven G. Sutlief, Sridhar Yaddanapudi, Sue Merkel, Mark Parry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,549,822
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#184
of 7,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,003
of 433,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#5
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.