| Title |
Continental risk assessment for understudied taxa post‐catastrophic wildfire indicates severe impacts on the Australian bee fauna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.15879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James B. Dorey, Celina M. Rebola, Olivia K. Davies, Kit S. Prendergast, Ben A. Parslow, Katja Hogendoorn, Remko Leijs, Lucas R. Hearn, Emrys J. Leitch, Robert L. O’Reilly, Jessica Marsh, John C. Z. Woinarski, Stefan Caddy‐Retalic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 15 | 38% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 53% |
| Scientists | 16 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#227,313
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#215
of 6,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,985
of 426,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#11
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.