@DarwinsMyth @JaTapps Just superficial Morphology - you should read more https://t.co/ULvdmExYj7
@Sciencecomptoir C'est en libre accès ici: https://t.co/GEXRXFvOAm … C'est le billet de ssaft qui est à l'origine de l'article pas l'inverse
@ToddClardy @coralreeffish @steinhartbart Well you got me to check... http://t.co/RCuAjtccPt http://t.co/boAGUK3Q4E
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ Casane 2013 BioEssays Wiley Online Library http://t.co/vOSIotWAUT
@JaTapps http://t.co/nIermZE36w Why coelacanths are not 'living fossils'@TheSunriseMusic @rockytech
@TunRaffy @TakeThatDarwin First, it's Coelacanth. Second, no, it's not. http://t.co/BsgPrglv9c Third, Coelacanth is the Order, not species.
@biobabbler Yes, I'm sure they are! This paper is a very thorough dissection of the living fossil idea, worth a read http://t.co/X4c890or6S
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ Casane 2013 BioEssays Wiley Online Library http://t.co/ynrSW1fQeT
#toolsforfools: free paper Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ http://t.co/mPPQzkY6dC
Le saviez-vous: l'article de blog publié sur SSAFT a poussé son auteur à écrire un article qui a été publié dans... http://t.co/78LoYw8qZR
Le saviez-vous: l'article de blog publié sur SSAFT a poussé son auteur à écrire un article qui a été publié dans... http://t.co/78LoYw8qZR
“Living fossil” not so “fossil” after all… Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’. http://t.co/ZFhScqsuAd
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ Casane 2013 BioEssays Wiley Online Library http://t.co/ChKpTknTuB
Journal club hijack! Massively off-topic with #coelacanths http://t.co/d1OjGeBhYX
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ Casane 2013 BioEssays Wiley Online Library http://t.co/T4USACdJ
Casane & Laurenti against "living fossil" bullshit: http://t.co/zxReeBeh
I totally agree. 'Living fossils' is a more than misleading term, not only for coelacanths. http://t.co/pA802A0n
Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ http://t.co/8QfAc8vN