↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Do activity monitors increase physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Do activity monitors increase physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Obesity, September 2016
DOI 10.1002/oby.21619
Pubmed ID
Authors

Herman J. de Vries, Thea J.M. Kooiman, Miriam W. van Ittersum, Marco van Brussel, Martijn de Groot

Abstract

To systematically assess contemporary knowledge regarding behavioral physical activity interventions including an activity monitor (BPAI+) in adults with overweight or obesity. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and PEDro were searched for eligible full-text articles up to 1 July 2015. Studies eligible for inclusion were (randomized) controlled trials describing physical activity outcomes in adults with overweight or obesity. Methodological quality was independently assessed employing the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for risk of bias. Fourteen studies (1,157 participants) were included for systematic review and 11 for meta-analysis. A positive trend in BPAI+ effects on several measures of physical activity was ascertained compared with both wait list or usual care and behavioral physical activity interventions without an activity monitor (BPAI-). No convincing evidence of BPAI+ effectiveness on weight loss was found compared with BPAI-. Behavioral physical activity interventions with an activity monitor increase physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity. Also, adding an activity monitor to behavioral physical activity interventions appears to increase the effect on physical activity, although current evidence has not yet provided conclusive evidence for its effectiveness.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 151 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 24%
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 43 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Sports and Recreations 16 10%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 8 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 36 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2019.
All research outputs
#512,814
of 15,285,871 outputs
Outputs from Obesity
#416
of 3,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,279
of 268,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity
#14
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,285,871 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.