| Title |
Impact of controlled neonicotinoid exposure on bumblebees in a realistic field setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12792 |
| Authors |
Andres N. Arce, Thomas I. David, Emma L. Randall, Ana Ramos Rodrigues, Thomas J. Colgan, Yannick Wurm, Richard J. Gill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 22% |
| United States | 7 | 10% |
| Canada | 6 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 81% |
| Scientists | 10 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 25% |
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 474. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#58,172
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#18
of 4,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,166
of 327,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.