↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations—Megavoltage photon and electron beams

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 2,034)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations—Megavoltage photon and electron beams
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, August 2022
DOI 10.1002/acm2.13641
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark W. Geurts, Dustin J. Jacqmin, Lindsay E. Jones, Stephen F. Kry, Dimitris N. Mihailidis, Jared D. Ohrt, Timothy Ritter, Jennifer B. Smilowitz, Nicholai E. Wingreen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Other 7 13%
Student > Master 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 14 25%
Engineering 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,122,715
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#43
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,114
of 431,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#4
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.