| Title |
What were the historical reasons for the resistance to recognizing airborne transmission during the COVID‐19 pandemic?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indoor Air, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ina.13070 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose L. Jimenez, Linsey C. Marr, Katherine Randall, Edward Thomas Ewing, Zeynep Tufekci, Trish Greenhalgh, Raymond Tellier, Julian W. Tang, Yuguo Li, Lidia Morawska, Jonathan Mesiano‐Crookston, David Fisman, Orla Hegarty, Stephanie J. Dancer, Philomena M. Bluyssen, Giorgio Buonanno, Marcel G. L. C. Loomans, William P. Bahnfleth, Maosheng Yao, Chandra Sekhar, Pawel Wargocki, Arsen K. Melikov, Kimberly A. Prather |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,933 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 863 | 12% |
| Canada | 502 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 357 | 5% |
| Australia | 216 | 3% |
| Spain | 144 | 2% |
| Japan | 103 | 1% |
| Mexico | 102 | 1% |
| France | 85 | 1% |
| Germany | 82 | 1% |
| Other | 741 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3738 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5867 | 85% |
| Scientists | 585 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 320 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 137 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 32% |
| Unknown | 42 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3309. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,866
of 25,934,828 outputs
Outputs from Indoor Air
#1
of 1,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 433,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indoor Air
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,934,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.