| Title |
3D Printing of Interdigitated Li‐Ion Microbattery Architectures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Materials, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/adma.201301036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ke Sun, Teng‐Sing Wei, Bok Yeop Ahn, Jung Yoon Seo, Shen J. Dillon, Jennifer A. Lewis |
| Abstract |
3D interdigitated microbattery architectures (3D-IMA) are fabricated by printing concentrated lithium oxide-based inks. The microbatteries are composed of interdigitated, high-aspect ratio cathode and anode structures. Our 3D-IMA, which exhibit high areal energy and power densities, may find potential application in autonomously powered microdevices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1273 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 362 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 173 | 13% |
| Researcher | 170 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 91 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 90 | 7% |
| Other | 173 | 13% |
| Unknown | 257 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 348 | 26% |
| Materials Science | 280 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 164 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 37 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 31 | 2% |
| Other | 125 | 9% |
| Unknown | 331 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#187,740
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#86
of 17,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,158
of 209,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#1
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.