AAPM code of practice for radiotherapy accelerators: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Task Group No. 45
Medical Physics, June 1998
Ravinder Nath, Peter J. Biggs, Frank J. Bova, C. Clifton Ling, James A. Purdy, Jan van de Geijn, Martin S. Weinhous
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||24||15%|
|Student > Master||24||15%|
|Student > Postgraduate||13||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||65||41%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||24||15%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||6||4%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
of 7,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 35,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
of 840 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,869 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 840 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.