Supplement to the 2004 update of the AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report
Medical Physics, May 2007
Mark J. Rivard, Wayne M. Butler, Larry A. DeWerd, M. Saiful Huq, Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ali S. Meigooni, Christopher S. Melhus, Michael G. Mitch, Ravinder Nath, Jeffrey F. Williamson
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||37||17%|
|Student > Master||30||14%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||19||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||114||52%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||31||14%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||8||4%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
of 7,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 74,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,888 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.