↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

How safe is mist netting? evaluating the risk of injury and mortality to birds

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
Title
How safe is mist netting? evaluating the risk of injury and mortality to birds
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, June 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00123.x
Authors

Erica N. Spotswood, Kari Roesch Goodman, Jay Carlisle, Renée L. Cormier, Diana L. Humple, Josée Rousseau, Susan L. Guers, Gina G. Barton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Brazil 9 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Spain 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 389 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 96 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 21%
Student > Master 77 18%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Other 28 6%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 21 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 311 71%
Environmental Science 77 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 26 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#382,487
of 15,570,293 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#138
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,322
of 67,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,570,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them