↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Clinical and palliative care outcomes for patients of poor performance status treated with antiprogrammed death‐1 monoclonal antibodies for advanced melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 572)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
88 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Clinical and palliative care outcomes for patients of poor performance status treated with antiprogrammed death‐1 monoclonal antibodies for advanced melanoma
Published in
Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, June 2017
DOI 10.1111/ajco.12702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annie Wong, Molly Williams, Donna Milne, Kortnye Morris, Peter Lau, Odette Spruyt, Sonia Fullerton, Grant McArthur

Abstract

Antiprogrammed death-1 antibodies (anti-PD1) have response rates of 40% in metastatic melanoma. Patients with poor performance status (PS) were excluded from clinical trials, yet use of anti-PD1 is widespread in clinical practice. Literature regarding clinical and palliative care outcomes in patients with poor PS treated with anti-PD1 is lacking. Retrospective review of outcomes for all patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD1 between 2012 and June 2015 at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, a tertiary specialist cancer center in Australia. Between 2012 and 2015, 91 patients received anti-PD1: median age 63, 65% males, 77% elevated LDH>1xULN (37/48 patients). Fifty-eight patients had baseline ECOG PS of 0-1 (64%), 24 patients ECOG PS 2-3 (26%) and ECOG PS was not recorded in nine patients (10%). Median overall survival (OS) for the ECOG PS 0-1 group was 19.5 months and 1.8 months for ECOG PS 2-3 (HR 5.5; 95% CI, 9.1-50.3; P = 0.0001). Tumor response was 23/58 (39%) in ECOG PS 0-1, 2/16 (12%) in ECOG PS 2 and 0/8 in ECOG PS 3. Toxicity did not differ between different groups. ECOG PS 2-3 patients were more likely to be treated and hospitalized within the last month of life compared to ECOG PS 0-1 patients, RR 1.75 (95% CI, 1.04-2.56, P = 0.019) and RR 1.73 (95% CI, 1.10-2.16, P = 0.009), respectively. ECOG PS 2-3 patients were more likely to die in an acute hospital RR 2.68 (95% CI, 1.17-6.51, P = 0.016). Patients with poor baseline PS have a significantly lower OS and reduced response to anti-PD1. Further quality of life and palliative care research is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Psychology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#778,010
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
#4
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,264
of 328,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.