↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Normal faulting sequence in the Pumqu‐Xainza Rift constrained by InSAR and teleseismic body‐wave seismology

Overview of attention for article published in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Normal faulting sequence in the Pumqu‐Xainza Rift constrained by InSAR and teleseismic body‐wave seismology
Published in
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/2014gc005369
Authors

Hua Wang, John R. Elliott, Timothy J. Craig, Tim J. Wright, Jing Liu‐Zeng, Andrew Hooper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 63%
Computer Science 3 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,263,464
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
#479
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,706
of 240,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.