| Title |
The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reading Research Quarterly, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rrq.85 |
| Authors |
Donald J. Leu, Elena Forzani, Chris Rhoads, Cheryl Maykel, Clint Kennedy, Nicole Timbrell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 33% |
| Australia | 4 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 334 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 49 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 8% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 80 | 23% |
| Unknown | 92 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 124 | 36% |
| Arts and Humanities | 37 | 11% |
| Linguistics | 25 | 7% |
| Psychology | 19 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 106 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,480,072
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Reading Research Quarterly
#63
of 550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,870
of 251,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading Research Quarterly
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.