↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology & Biogeography, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
Title
The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators
Published in
Global Ecology & Biogeography, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/geb.12236
Authors

Thomas M. Newsome, Justin A. Dellinger, Chris R. Pavey, William J. Ripple, Carolyn R. Shores, Aaron J. Wirsing, Christopher R. Dickman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
India 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 415 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 26%
Student > Master 87 20%
Researcher 66 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Other 18 4%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 55 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 224 52%
Environmental Science 107 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 1%
Engineering 5 1%
Social Sciences 4 <1%
Other 18 4%
Unknown 69 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#289,044
of 22,154,328 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#51
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,992
of 226,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,154,328 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.