↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology & Biogeography, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 1,141)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
Title
The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators
Published in
Global Ecology & Biogeography, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/geb.12236
Authors

Thomas M. Newsome, Justin A. Dellinger, Chris R. Pavey, William J. Ripple, Carolyn R. Shores, Aaron J. Wirsing, Christopher R. Dickman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
India 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 3 1%
Chile 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 243 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 27%
Student > Master 60 23%
Researcher 44 17%
Unspecified 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 46 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 159 60%
Environmental Science 61 23%
Unspecified 29 11%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 1%
Other 8 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#127,911
of 13,155,997 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#19
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,388
of 211,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,155,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.