↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
96 tweeters
facebook
24 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007238.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sng BL, Leong WL, Zeng Y, Siddiqui FJ, Assam PN, Lim Y, Chan ES, Sia AT, Sng, Ban Leong, Leong, Wan Ling, Zeng, Yanzhi, Siddiqui, Fahad Javaid, Assam, Pryseley N, Lim, Yvonne, Chan, Edwin SY, Sia, Alex T

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 26 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 26 59%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#57,838
of 8,636,286 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 8,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,604
of 199,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,636,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.