↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Recommended ethics curriculum for medical physics graduate and residency programs: Report of Task Group 159

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Recommended ethics curriculum for medical physics graduate and residency programs: Report of Task Group 159
Published in
Medical Physics, July 2010
DOI 10.1118/1.3451116
Authors

Christopher F. Serago, Jay W. Burmeister, Peter B. Dunscombe, Ashley A. Gale, William R. Hendee, Stephen F. Kry, Cheng-Shie Wuu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 9%
United States 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 37 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Other 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 33 77%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Unspecified 3 7%
Linguistics 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#9,869,515
of 12,362,639 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#4,368
of 5,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,332
of 227,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#102
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,362,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,412 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.