Title |
Single‐cell mass cytometry reveals intracellular survival/proliferative signaling in FLT3‐ITD‐mutated AML stem/progenitor cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cytometry Part A, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/cyto.a.22628 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lina Han, Peng Qiu, Zhihong Zeng, Jeffrey L. Jorgensen, Duncan H. Mak, Jared K. Burks, Wendy Schober, Teresa J. McQueen, Jorge Cortes, Scott D. Tanner, Gail J. Roboz, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Steven M. Kornblau, Monica L. Guzman, Michael Andreeff, Marina Konopleva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
Other | 19 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 9% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2017.
All research outputs
#13,786,643
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Cytometry Part A
#813
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,134
of 362,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytometry Part A
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.