| Title |
Effects of habitat quality and access management on the density of a recovering grizzly bear population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13056 |
| Authors |
Clayton T. Lamb, Garth Mowat, Aaron Reid, Laura Smit, Michael Proctor, Bruce N. McLellan, Scott E. Nielsen, Stan Boutin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 331 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 75 | 23% |
| United States | 72 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 4% |
| Spain | 11 | 3% |
| Iceland | 3 | <1% |
| Djibouti | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 127 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 263 | 79% |
| Scientists | 52 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 18% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 54 | 27% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 46 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 389. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#79,793
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#22
of 4,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,924
of 452,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.