| Title |
Light grazing of saltmarshes is a direct and indirect cause of nest failure in Common Redshank Tringa totanus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ibis, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ibi.12249 |
| Authors |
Elwyn Sharps, Jennifer Smart, Martin W. Skov, Angus Garbutt, Jan G. Hiddink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 31% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 75% |
| Scientists | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#800,094
of 25,059,640 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#134
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,900
of 262,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,059,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.