Title |
Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010856.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zipporah Iheozor‐Ejiofor, Helen V Worthington, Tanya Walsh, Lucy O'Malley, Jan E Clarkson, Richard Macey, Rahul Alam, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch, Anne‐Marie Glenny |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 30 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 20 | 13% |
Australia | 14 | 9% |
Spain | 10 | 7% |
Canada | 9 | 6% |
New Zealand | 6 | 4% |
Chile | 2 | 1% |
Japan | 2 | 1% |
Latvia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Unknown | 52 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 109 | 72% |
Scientists | 22 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 945 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 939 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 160 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 117 | 12% |
Researcher | 68 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 6% |
Other | 150 | 16% |
Unknown | 329 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 363 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 31 | 3% |
Psychology | 18 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 2% |
Other | 107 | 11% |
Unknown | 353 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 518. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#49,327
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#398
of 278,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.