↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Paradigms for parasite conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Paradigms for parasite conservation
Published in
Conservation Biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1111/cobi.12634
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric R. Dougherty, Colin J. Carlson, Veronica M. Bueno, Kevin R. Burgio, Carrie A. Cizauskas, Christopher F. Clements, Dana P. Seidel, Nyeema C. Harris

Abstract

Parasitic species, which depend directly on host species for their survival, represent a major regulatory force in ecosystems and a significant component of Earth's biodiversity. Yet the negative impacts of parasites observed at the host level have motivated a conservation paradigm of eradication, moving us further from attainment of taxonomically unbiased conservation goals. Despite a growing body of literature highlighting the importance of parasite-inclusive conservation, most parasite species remain understudied, underfunded, and underappreciated. We argue the protection of parasitic biodiversity requires a paradigm shift in the perception and valuation of their role as consumer species, similar to that of apex predators in the mid-20(th) century. Beyond recognizing parasites as vital trophic regulators, existing tools available to conservation practitioners should explicitly account for the unique threats facing dependent species. We build on concepts from epidemiology and economics to introduce novel metrics of "margin of error" and "minimum investment" for parasite conservation. Once suitable parasites are identified, we describe methods for constructing population viability analyses for host-parasite assemblages. In the direst cases, ex situ breeding programs for parasites should be evaluated to maximize success without undermining host protection. Though parasitic species pose a considerable conservation challenge, adaptations to the conservation toolbox will help protect parasite biodiversity in the face of an uncertain environmental future. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 140 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Student > Master 35 23%
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Unspecified 17 11%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 51%
Unspecified 25 16%
Environmental Science 19 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Other 11 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2018.
All research outputs
#366,215
of 13,621,997 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#246
of 2,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,890
of 246,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,621,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.