↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Reevaluating sighting models and moving beyond them to test and contextualize the extinction of the thylacine

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Reevaluating sighting models and moving beyond them to test and contextualize the extinction of the thylacine
Published in
Conservation Biology, August 2018
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin J. Carlson, Alexander L. Bond, Kevin R. Burgio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#870,405
of 13,906,046 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#623
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,353
of 274,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,906,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.