↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Reevaluating sighting models and moving beyond them to test and contextualize the extinction of the thylacine

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Reevaluating sighting models and moving beyond them to test and contextualize the extinction of the thylacine
Published in
Conservation Biology, August 2018
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin J. Carlson, Alexander L. Bond, Kevin R. Burgio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Unspecified 2 33%
Psychology 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#874,750
of 13,621,997 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#632
of 2,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,965
of 268,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,621,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.