↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Lived experience of Indonesian nurses in Japan: A phenomenological study

Overview of attention for article published in Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS., January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
Title
Lived experience of Indonesian nurses in Japan: A phenomenological study
Published in
Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS., January 2016
DOI 10.1111/jjns.12108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ferry Efendi, Ching-Min Chen, Nursalam Nursalam, Retno Indarwati, Elida Ulfiana

Abstract

The movement of Indonesian nurses via a bilateral agreement with Japan has led to a substantial number of migrants to work as nurses in that nation's healthcare system. The purpose of this research was to develop a deeper understanding of the meaningful experiences of Indonesian nurses while working in Japanese hospitals. In this phenomenological study, sampling was purposive and was based on information shared by five Indonesian nurses. The data were collected in interviews; the analysis was thematic. Six key themes were identified: (i) seeking better than before; (ii) communication challenges; (iii) the nursing examination as a culmination; (iv) differences in nursing practice; (v) cultural differences; and (vi) the benefits of living in developed country. Among these challenges, communication as the basis of shared meaning and understanding was viewed as a complex issue, by both patients and coworkers. The results of this study call for further intervention in supporting Indonesian nurses living in Japan in their struggle with the issue of communication. The emphasis on language acquisition for personal and professional objectives, and the bridging of cultural differences as well, should be considered in an international context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 <1%
Unknown 359 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Student > Master 20 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 3%
Other 8 2%
Other 26 7%
Unknown 222 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 87 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 5%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 1%
Linguistics 3 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 223 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,184,741
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS.
#64
of 194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,443
of 403,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS.
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.