| Title |
The diversity of population responses to environmental change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.13195 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernando Colchero, Owen R. Jones, Dalia A. Conde, David Hodgson, Felix Zajitschek, Benedikt R. Schmidt, Aurelio F. Malo, Susan C. Alberts, Peter H. Becker, Sandra Bouwhuis, Anne M. Bronikowski, Kristel M. De Vleeschouwer, Richard J. Delahay, Stefan Dummermuth, Eduardo Fernández‐Duque, John Frisenvænge, Martin Hesselsøe, Sam Larson, Jean‐François Lemaître, Jennifer McDonald, David A.W. Miller, Colin O'Donnell, Craig Packer, Becky E. Raboy, Chris J. Reading, Erik Wapstra, Henri Weimerskirch, Geoffrey M. While, Annette Baudisch, Thomas Flatt, Tim Coulson, Jean‐Michel Gaillard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 24% |
| Researcher | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 52 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 54 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2020.
All research outputs
#334,526
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#140
of 3,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,440
of 448,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#4
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.