↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Are we eating the world's megafauna to extinction?

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 742)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
276 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Are we eating the world's megafauna to extinction?
Published in
Conservation Letters, February 2019
DOI 10.1111/conl.12627
Authors

William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Matthew G. Betts, Gerardo Ceballos, Franck Courchamp, Matt W. Hayward, Blaire Valkenburgh, Arian D. Wallach, Boris Worm

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 276 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 15 18%
Unspecified 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 44%
Environmental Science 23 27%
Unspecified 11 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 7 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 569. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#12,342
of 13,393,332 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#2
of 742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#498
of 287,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,393,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.