Monitor unit calculations for external photon and electron beams: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group No. 71
Medical Physics, February 2014
John P. Gibbons, John A. Antolak, David S. Followill, M. Saiful Huq, Eric E. Klein, Kwok L. Lam, Jatinder R. Palta, Donald M. Roback, Mark Reid, Faiz M. Khan
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||56||17%|
|Student > Master||48||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||17||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||133||40%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||63||19%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||9||3%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||6||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
of 7,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 226,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,872 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.