| Title |
Nanoparticles in the clinic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/btm2.10003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron C. Anselmo, Samir Mitragotri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 39% |
| Portugal | 3 | 8% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 53% |
| Scientists | 14 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1392 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 323 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 170 | 12% |
| Researcher | 149 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 124 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 59 | 4% |
| Other | 151 | 11% |
| Unknown | 421 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 178 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 166 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 159 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 7% |
| Engineering | 87 | 6% |
| Other | 253 | 18% |
| Unknown | 462 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#965,317
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
#12
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,885
of 356,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.