| Title |
Where the wild things are: influence of radiation on the distribution of four mammalian species within the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/fee.1227 |
| Authors |
Sarah C Webster, Michael E Byrne, Stacey L Lance, Cara N Love, Thomas G Hinton, Dmitry Shamovich, James C Beasley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 75% |
| Scientists | 10 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 23% |
| Researcher | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 20% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 698. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#29,913
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#9
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#526
of 313,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.