↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182
Published in
Medical Physics, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/mp.13910
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce R. Thomadsen, Peter J. Biggs, Gene A. Cardarelli, James C. H. Chu, Robert A. Cormack, Wenzheng Feng, H. Thompson Heaton, Jessica R. Hiatt, Jonathan N. Law, Jeffery P. Limmer, Zoubir Ouhib, Sujatha Pai, Sushakumari Pillai, Michael R. Ringor, Mark J. Rivard, Timothy J. Waldron, Barrett S. Caldwell, Randall W. Holt, Tina L. Pike, Habib Safigholi, Christopher Stacey, Frank Weigand

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Mathematics 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#9,901,581
of 15,606,605 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#4,232
of 6,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,378
of 290,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#62
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,606,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,355 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.