↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Electronic intracavitary brachytherapy quality management based on risk analysis: The report of AAPM TG 182
Published in
Medical Physics, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/mp.13910
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce R. Thomadsen, Peter J. Biggs, Gene A. Cardarelli, James C. H. Chu, Robert A. Cormack, Wenzheng Feng, H. Thompson Heaton, Jessica R. Hiatt, Jonathan N. Law, Jeffery P. Limmer, Zoubir Ouhib, Sujatha Pai, Sushakumari Pillai, Michael R. Ringor, Mark J. Rivard, Timothy J. Waldron, Barrett S. Caldwell, Randall W. Holt, Tina L. Pike, Habib Safigholi, Christopher Stacey, Frank Weigand

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 8 29%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Mathematics 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#10,945,555
of 17,663,872 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#4,212
of 6,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,206
of 337,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#63
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,663,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,765 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.