↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Dealing with Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A New Frontier for Conservation Planning

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
42 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Dealing with Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A New Frontier for Conservation Planning
Published in
Conservation Letters, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12260
Authors

Amy L. Whitehead, Heini Kujala, Brendan A. Wintle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 28%
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Other 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 65 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2022.
All research outputs
#815,967
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#285
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,803
of 368,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.