↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Dealing with Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A New Frontier for Conservation Planning

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Dealing with Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A New Frontier for Conservation Planning
Published in
Conservation Letters, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12260
Authors

Amy L. Whitehead, Heini Kujala, Brendan A. Wintle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 30%
Student > Master 27 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Other 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 11 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 56 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 28%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 20 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#512,764
of 17,145,811 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#213
of 869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,822
of 271,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,145,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.