| Title |
Storm impacts on phytoplankton community dynamics in lakes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.15033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason D. Stockwell, Jonathan P. Doubek, Rita Adrian, Orlane Anneville, Cayelan C. Carey, Laurence Carvalho, Lisette N. De Senerpont Domis, Gaël Dur, Marieke A. Frassl, Hans‐Peter Grossart, Bas W. Ibelings, Marc J. Lajeunesse, Aleksandra M. Lewandowska, María E. Llames, Shin‐Ichiro S. Matsuzaki, Emily R. Nodine, Peeter Nõges, Vijay P. Patil, Francesco Pomati, Karsten Rinke, Lars G. Rudstam, James A. Rusak, Nico Salmaso, Christian T. Seltmann, Dietmar Straile, Stephen J. Thackeray, Wim Thiery, Pablo Urrutia‐Cordero, Patrick Venail, Piet Verburg, R. Iestyn Woolway, Tamar Zohary, Mikkel R. Andersen, Ruchi Bhattacharya, Josef Hejzlar, Nasime Janatian, Alfred T. N. K. Kpodonu, Tanner J. Williamson, Harriet L. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 12% |
| France | 10 | 8% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 57% |
| Scientists | 51 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 245 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 16% |
| Researcher | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 71 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 69 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 93 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#205,427
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#179
of 6,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,934
of 389,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#9
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.