| Title |
Is seabird light‐induced mortality explained by the visual system development?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Science and Practice, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/csp2.195 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Atchoi, Mindaugas Mitkus, Airam Rodríguez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 5 | 9% |
| Portugal | 3 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 71% |
| Scientists | 13 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#859,349
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#136
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,187
of 388,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.