↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Is seabird light‐induced mortality explained by the visual system development?

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Science and Practice, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 216)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
61 tweeters
Title
Is seabird light‐induced mortality explained by the visual system development?
Published in
Conservation Science and Practice, March 2020
DOI 10.1111/csp2.195
Authors

Elizabeth Atchoi, Mindaugas Mitkus, Airam Rodríguez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#474,726
of 15,184,383 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#25
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,136
of 251,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,184,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.