| Title |
The meteoritic origin of Tutankhamun's iron dagger blade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Meteoritics & Planetary Science, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/maps.12664 |
| Authors |
Daniela Comelli, Massimo D'orazio, Luigi Folco, Mahmud El‐Halwagy, Tommaso Frizzi, Roberto Alberti, Valentina Capogrosso, Abdelrazek Elnaggar, Hala Hassan, Austin Nevin, Franco Porcelli, Mohamed G. Rashed, Gianluca Valentini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 411 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 34 | 8% |
| United States | 28 | 7% |
| Japan | 22 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| Belgium | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 48 | 12% |
| Unknown | 233 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 365 | 89% |
| Scientists | 30 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1803. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,751
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from Meteoritics & Planetary Science
#1
of 1,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51
of 350,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meteoritics & Planetary Science
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them