↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Analysis of Trade-Offs Between Biodiversity, Carbon Farming and Agricultural Development in Northern Australia Reveals the Benefits of Strategic Planning

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of Trade-Offs Between Biodiversity, Carbon Farming and Agricultural Development in Northern Australia Reveals the Benefits of Strategic Planning
Published in
Conservation Letters, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/conl.12255
Authors

Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez, Amy L Whitehead, Gary W Luck, Garry D Cook, Ramona Maggini, James A Fitzsimons, Brendan A Wintle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 31 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 32%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 14 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#740,688
of 15,736,846 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#302
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,505
of 268,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,736,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.