↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Technical Note: Gray tracking in medical color displays-A report of Task Group 196

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Physics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Technical Note: Gray tracking in medical color displays-A report of Task Group 196
Published in
Medical Physics, June 2016
DOI 10.1118/1.4953186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aldo Badano, Joel Wang, Paul Boynton, Patrick Le Callet, Wei-Chung Cheng, Danny Deroo, Michael J. Flynn, Takashi Matsui, John Penczek, Craig Revie, Ehsan Samei, Peter M. Steven, Stan Swiderski, Gert Van Hoey, Matsuhiro Yamaguchi, Mikio Hasegawa, Balázs Vince Nagy

Abstract

The authors discuss measurement methods and instrumentation useful for the characterization of the gray tracking performance of medical color monitors for diagnostic applications. The authors define gray tracking as the variability in the chromaticity of the gray levels in a color monitor. The authors present data regarding the capability of color measurement instruments with respect to their abilities to measure a target white point corresponding to the CIE Standard Illuminant D65 at different luminance values within the grayscale palette of a medical display. The authors then discuss evidence of significant differences in performance among color measurement instruments currently available for medical physicists to perform calibrations and image quality checks for the consistent representation of color in medical displays. In addition, the authors introduce two metrics for quantifying grayscale chromaticity consistency of gray tracking. The authors' findings show that there is an order of magnitude difference in the accuracy of field and reference instruments. The gray tracking metrics quantify how close the grayscale chromaticity is to the chromaticity of the full white point (equal amounts of red, green, and blue at maximum level) or to consecutive levels (equal values for red, green, and blue), with a lower value representing an improved grayscale tracking performance. An illustrative example of how to calculate and report the gray tracking performance according to the Task Group definitions is provided. The authors' proposed methodology for characterizing the grayscale degradation in chromaticity for color monitors that can be used to establish standards and procedures aiding in the quality control testing of color displays and color measurement instrumentation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,545,756
of 12,362,744 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#2,938
of 5,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,988
of 274,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#48
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,362,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.