↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM medical physics practice guideline 7.a.: Supervision of medical physicist assistants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
AAPM medical physics practice guideline 7.a.: Supervision of medical physicist assistants
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/acm2.12774
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Anthony Seibert, Anthony P. Blatnica, Jessica B. Clements, Per H. Halvorsen, Michael G. Herman, Jennifer L. Johnson, Beth A. Schueler, Melissa C. Martin, Jatinder R. Palta, Douglas E. Pfeiffer, Robert J. Pizzutiello, Joann I. Prisciandaro, George W. Sherouse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Other 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Lecturer 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 24%
Physics and Astronomy 4 19%
Psychology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#969
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,753
of 473,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#16
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.