↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM medical physics practice guideline 3.b.: Levels of supervision for medical physicists in clinical training

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
AAPM medical physics practice guideline 3.b.: Levels of supervision for medical physicists in clinical training
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/acm2.13258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas Pfeiffer, Hania Al‐Hallaq, Per Halvorsen, Kristi Hendrickson, Zheng Feng Lu, Melissa Carol Martin, Beth Schueler, Jillian Shuman, Jacqueline E. Zoberi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 32%
Unspecified 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,132
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#370
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,653
of 456,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#9
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.