↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 12.a: Fluoroscopy dose management

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 12.a: Fluoroscopy dose management
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, February 2022
DOI 10.1002/acm2.13526
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan F. Fisher, Kimberly E. Applegate, Lindsey K. Berkowitz, Olav Christianson, Jaydev K. Dave, Lindsay DeWeese, Nichole Harris, Mary Ellen Jafari, A. Kyle Jones, Robert J. Kobistek, Brendan Loughran, Loren Marous, Donald L. Miller, Beth Schueler, Bryan C. Schwarz, Adam Springer, Kevin A. Wunderle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,078,324
of 25,460,285 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#203
of 2,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,651
of 449,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.