↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations — Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
Title
AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a.: Commissioning and QA of Treatment Planning Dose Calculations — Megavoltage Photon and Electron Beams
Published in
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, September 2015
DOI 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5768
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer B. Smilowitz, Indra J. Das, Vladimir Feygelman, Benedick A. Fraass, Stephen F. Kry, Ingrid R. Marshall, Dimitris N. Mihailidis, Zoubir Ouhib, Timothy Ritter, Michael G. Snyder, Lynne Fairobent

Abstract

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is a nonprofit professional society whose primary purposes are to advance the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. The AAPM has more than 8,000 members and is the principal organization of medical physicists in the United States. The AAPM will periodically define new practice guidelines for medical physics practice to help advance the science of medical physics and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the United States. Existing medical physics practice guidelines will be reviewed for the purpose of revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner. Each medical physics practice guideline represents a policy statement by the AAPM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review, and requires the approval of the Professional Council. The medical physics practice guidelines recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guidelines and technical standards by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. The following terms are used in the AAPM practice guidelines: Must and Must Not: Used to indicate that adherence to the recommendation is considered necessary to conform to this practice guideline. Should and Should Not: Used to indicate a prudent practice to which exceptions may occasionally be made in appropriate circumstances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 259 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Student > Master 35 13%
Other 27 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 66 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 113 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 17%
Engineering 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 74 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,691,410
of 24,698,625 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#284
of 1,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,422
of 272,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,625 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,961 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.