↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Montane forest root growth and soil organic layer depth as potential factors stabilizing Cenozoic global change

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Montane forest root growth and soil organic layer depth as potential factors stabilizing Cenozoic global change
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/2013gl058737
Authors

Christopher E. Doughty, Lyla L. Taylor, Cecile A. J. Girardin, Yadvinder Malhi, David J. Beerling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Master 9 16%
Professor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#385,290
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#895
of 20,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,812
of 318,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#7
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.