↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Clinical implications of sperm DNA damage in IVF and ICSI : updated systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Clinical implications of sperm DNA damage in IVF and ICSI : updated systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
Biological Reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1111/brv.12700
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordi Ribas‐Maynou, Marc Yeste, Nerea Becerra‐Tomás, Kenneth I. Aston, Emma R. James, Albert Salas‐Huetos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 17%
Psychology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Unknown 8 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,739,616
of 18,908,606 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#605
of 1,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,002
of 309,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,908,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.