↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Clinical implications of sperm DNA damage in IVF and ICSI: updated systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 1,555)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Clinical implications of sperm DNA damage in IVF and ICSI: updated systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
Biological Reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1111/brv.12700
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordi Ribas‐Maynou, Marc Yeste, Nerea Becerra‐Tomás, Kenneth I. Aston, Emma R. James, Albert Salas‐Huetos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 26 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Unspecified 5 7%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 30 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 211. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#181,351
of 25,183,822 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#31
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,345
of 428,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,183,822 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.