The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Clinical implications of sperm DNA damage in IVF and ICSI: updated systematic review and meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/brv.12700 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordi Ribas‐Maynou, Marc Yeste, Nerea Becerra‐Tomás, Kenneth I. Aston, Emma R. James, Albert Salas‐Huetos |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 211. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#193,931
of 26,310,456 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#32
of 1,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,874
of 457,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,310,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.