↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,040)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
648 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists
Published in
Conservation Letters, March 2021
DOI 10.1111/conl.12797
Authors

Bea Maas, Robin J Pakeman, Laurent Godet, Linnea Smith, Vincent Devictor, Richard Primack

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 648 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 37 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 27%
Environmental Science 36 21%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Unspecified 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 55 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 620. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#33,893
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#9
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,254
of 425,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.