↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,080)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
625 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists
Published in
Conservation Letters, March 2021
DOI 10.1111/conl.12797
Authors

Bea Maas, Robin J Pakeman, Laurent Godet, Linnea Smith, Vincent Devictor, Richard Primack

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 625 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 47 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 28%
Environmental Science 37 20%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 66 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 602. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#39,088
of 25,941,588 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#8
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,500
of 455,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,941,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.