| Title |
Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12797 |
| Authors |
Bea Maas, Robin J Pakeman, Laurent Godet, Linnea Smith, Vincent Devictor, Richard Primack |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 648 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 71 | 11% |
| United States | 70 | 11% |
| Germany | 35 | 5% |
| Spain | 20 | 3% |
| Canada | 19 | 3% |
| Brazil | 18 | 3% |
| Australia | 16 | 2% |
| France | 15 | 2% |
| South Africa | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 127 | 20% |
| Unknown | 245 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 373 | 58% |
| Scientists | 249 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 170 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 620. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#33,893
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#9
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,254
of 425,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.